Implementation of peer review organization (PRO) program
Read Online

Implementation of peer review organization (PRO) program hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, July 31, 1984. by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Subcommittee on Health.

  • 776 Want to read
  • ·
  • 21 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O. in Washington .
Written in English



  • United States.


  • Professional standards review organizations (Medicine) -- United States.,
  • Medicare.

Book details:

Edition Notes

SeriesS. hrg. ;, 98-1117
LC ClassificationsKF26 .F5538 1984f
The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 171 p. :
Number of Pages171
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL2664038M
LC Control Number85601454

Download Implementation of peer review organization (PRO) program


Get this from a library! Implementation of peer review organization (PRO) program: hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, J [United States. Congress. Senate. . peer review ratings guidance Early implementation is not permitted! Summary of key change areas from YB New format and organization Independence requirements related to nonaudit services CPE Peer review requirements Finding guidance Waste and abuse Standards for reviews of financial statements Performance audits Other The results of the peer review team’s evaluation are submitted in a peer review report. The reviewed CPA firm or governmental audit organization responds in writing to the peer review team’s comments on matters in the peer review report and/or in the letter of comments.   Diane Beakey, PhD, is a faculty member of the Applied Behavioral Science Department in the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University, and Principal of The Beakey Group, a Los Angeles based-consulting firm, with a wide variety of clients in industries including: finance, information technology, oil and gas, entertainment, and healthcare : Diane Beakey, Kathleen Wells Webster, Jackie Rubin.

Peer Review Organization (PRO) / Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Page Content State Medicaid agencies are required to provide quality assurance and fee-for-service utilization review in the inpatient hospital settings for services provided to participants in the Medical Assistance program and Illinois contracts with a PRO/QIO to conduct.   INTRODUCTION. Virtually every school of pharmacy in the United States uses student evaluations to assess course and teacher effectiveness, while only about 50% utilize some form of peer evaluation among faculty members. 1 One primary reason for lack of emphasis on peer review is the lack of guidance for faculty members who wish to do the work of peer review well. 2 Student evaluations of Cited by: peer review Team Leader’s OIG must also report required information on the Reviewed Organization’s external peer review in its SAR.6 5 Unless otherwise noted, references to a peer review report include the summary report, letter of comments (Enclosure 1), and Reviewed Organization management comments to the draft report (Enclosure 2).File Size: KB. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences () – The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education conference. doi: / ScienceDirect Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education Strategic implementation as a Cited by: 5.

Nursing peer review committee members were also educated in the use of NPR principles including just culture, appreciative inquiry, and confidentiality. OUTCOME: Upon implementation, nearly referrals were received within the first 14 months; 85% met criteria for by: 2. The Yellow Book offers professionals a new format with which to read and understand the rules. As audits under GAS continue to be highly scrutinized and receive increased attention during peer review, CPAs who perform these audits need to be familiar with the detailed rules or risk having problems in peer review or with licensing regulators. This book also incorporates three previous books: Effective Peer Review, Peer Review Best Practices, and Measuring Physician Competency. Now readers have one, all-encompassing resource to answer their peer review and physician performance questions. This completely updated book will help you: Engage physicians in the peer review process/5(2). Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program.